<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome Washington Post, USA Today readers</title>
	<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/05/welcome-washington-post-usa-today-readers/</link>
	<description>A blog about and from PhishTank, a collaborative clearinghouse for data about phishing.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/05/welcome-washington-post-usa-today-readers/#comment-47</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 21:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/05/welcome-washington-post-usa-today-readers/#comment-47</guid>
					<description>Christopher, and others, we're five days in, and we do see some areas we can improve.

I've called many of them out in this morning's blog post:
http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/06/how-phishtank-works-what-is-coming-next/

What you see as false positives are often mis-parsing of email submissions. We're moving quickly to correct these mistakes. Then we'll make new ones, and you can tell us about those! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher, and others, we&#8217;re five days in, and we do see some areas we can improve.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve called many of them out in this morning&#8217;s blog post:<br />
<a href='http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/06/how-phishtank-works-what-is-coming-next/' rel='nofollow'>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/06/how-phishtank-works-what-is-coming-next/</a></p>
<p>What you see as false positives are often mis-parsing of email submissions. We&#8217;re moving quickly to correct these mistakes. Then we&#8217;ll make new ones, and you can tell us about those! <img src='http://www.phishtank.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/05/welcome-washington-post-usa-today-readers/#comment-45</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/05/welcome-washington-post-usa-today-readers/#comment-45</guid>
					<description>Nice website, and a hell of an idea! Like your welcome message too - Thanks go to USA Today where I
saw the article/write-up; I get more spam and phish then you would believe! Nice to know I can
'deposit' them here for analysis.....Thanks folks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice website, and a hell of an idea! Like your welcome message too - Thanks go to USA Today where I<br />
saw the article/write-up; I get more spam and phish then you would believe! Nice to know I can<br />
&#8216;deposit&#8217; them here for analysis&#8230;..Thanks folks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/05/welcome-washington-post-usa-today-readers/#comment-44</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 14:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/10/05/welcome-washington-post-usa-today-readers/#comment-44</guid>
					<description>I myself joined after reading the WP article (been waiting for a collaborative site like this to come along!) However, I'm disappointed by the amount of false positives I've seen submitted - sites like ebay.co.uk (obviously legit, I use it all the time!) and tye Yahoo! Mail front page... subdomains on perfectly legitimate URLs which, possibly (maybe, I'm just theorising) because the person can't understand how a subdomain works in relation to its parent domain...

I've already gone through at least forty or fifty sites and marked up the false positives, incorrect URLs... I hope that this ratio is going to improve. I also hope to see at some point a "Warn User" feature so that people who submit needless false positives can be flagged on the system, and maybe eventually banned if they continue, as it's a waste of everyone's time.


Aside from that, the site has real promise, and hell - it's only a couple of days old since its public opening! I look forward to becoming part of a great community that can actually do something positive towards curbing the sheer amount of crap attempting to take your personal data off you without you realising. Nice one guys. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself joined after reading the WP article (been waiting for a collaborative site like this to come along!) However, I&#8217;m disappointed by the amount of false positives I&#8217;ve seen submitted - sites like ebay.co.uk (obviously legit, I use it all the time!) and tye Yahoo! Mail front page&#8230; subdomains on perfectly legitimate URLs which, possibly (maybe, I&#8217;m just theorising) because the person can&#8217;t understand how a subdomain works in relation to its parent domain&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve already gone through at least forty or fifty sites and marked up the false positives, incorrect URLs&#8230; I hope that this ratio is going to improve. I also hope to see at some point a &#8220;Warn User&#8221; feature so that people who submit needless false positives can be flagged on the system, and maybe eventually banned if they continue, as it&#8217;s a waste of everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
<p>Aside from that, the site has real promise, and hell - it&#8217;s only a couple of days old since its public opening! I look forward to becoming part of a great community that can actually do something positive towards curbing the sheer amount of crap attempting to take your personal data off you without you realising. Nice one guys. <img src='http://www.phishtank.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
