Comments on: Announcing November Stats http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/ A blog about and from PhishTank, a collaborative clearinghouse for data about phishing. Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:37:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: Terry (clubjuggle) http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-397 Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:14:15 +0000 http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-397 Wow... great work all around! The dramatic improvement in time to verification is very encouraging, especially in light of the equally dramatic increase in submissions. A quick note for the editors: "In October, 1,299 phishes (16% of valid phishes that month) used an IP address (i.e. http://12.34.56.78) and 8,329 (or 84%) used a domain name (i.e. http://example.com)." That should be November, of course. Wow… great work all around! The dramatic improvement in time to verification is very encouraging, especially in light of the equally dramatic increase in submissions.

A quick note for the editors:

“In October, 1,299 phishes (16% of valid phishes that month) used an IP address (i.e. http://12.34.56.78) and 8,329 (or 84%) used a domain name (i.e. http://example.com).”

That should be November, of course.

]]> by: someone1234 http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-352 Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:31:34 +0000 http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-352 A statistics for accuracy of verifiers and submitters would be fun. Both the highest and the lowest 10. A statistics for accuracy of verifiers and submitters would be fun.
Both the highest and the lowest 10.

]]> by: Walter A Taucher http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-342 Sat, 02 Dec 2006 07:30:08 +0000 http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-342 Good work guys. When we vote to verify a phish, it would be appreciated that if the link to the next unverified site was close to the vote buttons, then we would not have to move the mouse so much to get to the next page. Not a bid deal for desktop users but for us notebook users, it will speed up the progress. And thank you for doing such a great job. We appreciate it. Good work guys. When we vote to verify a phish, it would be appreciated that if the link to the next unverified site
was close to the vote buttons, then we would not have to move the mouse so much to get to the next page.

Not a bid deal for desktop users but for us notebook users, it will speed up the progress.

And thank you for doing such a great job. We appreciate it.

]]> by: MASA http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-341 Sat, 02 Dec 2006 07:15:55 +0000 http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2006/12/01/announcing-november-stats/#comment-341 On digg now: http://digg.com/security/PhishTank_releases_November_Phishing_Stats On digg now:

http://digg.com/security/PhishTank_releases_November_Phishing_Stats

]]>