<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PhishTank faster in March</title>
	<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/</link>
	<description>A blog about and from PhishTank, a collaborative clearinghouse for data about phishing.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Aleksandersen</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-16753</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-16753</guid>
					<description>I am surprised to see that most phishing comes from the USA. I though Russia and developing countries where the origin of most phising attempts.

Could this data be inaccurate because USA originated phising attempts get verified more easily?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised to see that most phishing comes from the USA. I though Russia and developing countries where the origin of most phising attempts.</p>
<p>Could this data be inaccurate because USA originated phising attempts get verified more easily?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: incidents.co.za &#187; Blog Archive &#187; phishtank and botnet</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-14659</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 07:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-14659</guid>
					<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ilgaz</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-14474</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-14474</guid>
					<description>It would be lots more faster if people stops submitting mortgage, scam and even software links as "phish".

I know there is a karma system here but it still effects the verify system.

I think a /ignore system could be needed in future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be lots more faster if people stops submitting mortgage, scam and even software links as &#8220;phish&#8221;.</p>
<p>I know there is a karma system here but it still effects the verify system.</p>
<p>I think a /ignore system could be needed in future.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mads Dam</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-14343</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/04/march-2007-statistics/#comment-14343</guid>
					<description>It's interesting to see the global distribution of phishes.
But it would also be nice to see the development;
How about making an animated chart as a supplement..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see the global distribution of phishes.<br />
But it would also be nice to see the development;<br />
How about making an animated chart as a supplement..?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
