<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! Mail adds PhishTank data to help protect customers</title>
	<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/19/yahoo-mail-phishtank/</link>
	<description>A blog about and from PhishTank, a collaborative clearinghouse for data about phishing.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Karl Viklund</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/19/yahoo-mail-phishtank/#comment-16819</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 22:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/19/yahoo-mail-phishtank/#comment-16819</guid>
					<description>Very very good to see.
I have been a user of Yahoo Mail since 1998-1999 and I'm really happy, it's the best service out there.
I submit Phish Emails to PhishTank that I receive via Yahoo Mail. But it seems like PhishTank is getting flooded with submissions right now so it takes too long for submissions to get status as actually being a Phishing site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very very good to see.<br />
I have been a user of Yahoo Mail since 1998-1999 and I&#8217;m really happy, it&#8217;s the best service out there.<br />
I submit Phish Emails to PhishTank that I receive via Yahoo Mail. But it seems like PhishTank is getting flooded with submissions right now so it takes too long for submissions to get status as actually being a Phishing site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Aleksandersen</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/19/yahoo-mail-phishtank/#comment-16756</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/19/yahoo-mail-phishtank/#comment-16756</guid>
					<description>I assume Yahoo! will give OpenDNS some kind of compensation for the huge network load? Servers, bandwidth, or something? It would be great if this could be disclosed as well as the "happy news".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume Yahoo! will give OpenDNS some kind of compensation for the huge network load? Servers, bandwidth, or something? It would be great if this could be disclosed as well as the &#8220;happy news&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ilgaz</title>
		<link>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/19/yahoo-mail-phishtank/#comment-16592</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.phishtank.com/blog/2007/04/19/yahoo-mail-phishtank/#comment-16592</guid>
					<description>I am very glad since it also means the shift of policy at Yahoo, as a registered user since '98 I really like the recent policy changes there, especially last 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very glad since it also means the shift of policy at Yahoo, as a registered user since &#8216;98 I really like the recent policy changes there, especially last 6 months.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
